Discussion about this post

User's avatar
stef's avatar
Apr 12Edited

Germ Theory and the Vital Force

It's a shame that Luc Montagnier, who had worked at the Pasteur Institute, is so highly regarded in the movie. Montagnier was widely known for his 'scientific' work on HIV. But germ theory is a refuted hypothesis, and no virus has ever been shown to exist, e.g. by being isolated from everything else, as shown by Canadian biostatistician Christine Massey. In early 2020, she started the Freedom of Information Project. This revealed through FOIs from more than 200 Health and Science Institutions that they are unable to cite valid scientific evidence for any virus. Christine's research makes it clear that 'virology is based on pseudoscience and germ "theory" has been falsified.' See https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/interviews/christine-massey-dont-trust-public-health/

The documentary while continuing to promote germ theory and the existence of infectious disease, completely ignores Terrain Theory which is much more in accordance with Hahnemanns' concept of the vital force.

stef's avatar
Apr 12Edited

Hanhnemann's Place in Medicine

With regard to the movie Introducing Homeopathy, the homeopathic principles 'discovered' by Hahnemann had already been described by Paracelsus (1493-1541), though his work had largely been forgotten. The famous English homeopath John Henry Clarke, wrote in the article Hahnemann's Place in Medicine, in 'The Homeopathic World', August 1922, page 215, of Hahnemann not giving Paracelsus the credit he deserved. Also Matthew Wood, in his book 'Vitalism: The History of Herbalism, Homeopathy, and Flower Essences', states "Almost the whole of homeopathy was anticipated in Paracelsian medicine."

Quoting Linn Boyd:

"The Paracelsian writings advance a simile, the small dose, the necessity for having drug pictures, the totality of the symptoms, the relationship of drug to disease, the single remedy, the individualization of the patient. All of these are attributes of the modern [homeopathic] simile which, however, applies these thoughts on a quite different basis."

Boyd, Linn (1936) A History of the Simile in Medicine, Boericke and Tafel, Philadelphia, page 16.

No posts

Ready for more?